corner
corner

Phys. Rev. D 26, 3342–3353 (1982)

On the canonical approach to quantum gravity

Download: PDF (507 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Abhay Ashtekar
Department of Physics, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13210 and Départment de Physique, Université de Clermont-Fd., 63170 Aubière, France

Gary T. Horowitz
Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey 08540

Received 14 July 1982; published in the issue dated 15 December 1982

General relativity has the property that, under the natural projection mapping, the image of the constraint surface in the phase space is a proper subset of the configuration space. This feature is not shared by other field theories of direct physical interest such as the Yang-Mills theory, nor by constrained systems which have been modeled after general relativity and analyzed in detail. Therefore, to gain insight into this feature, a new example with a finite number of degrees of freedom is introduced and quantized. The analysis suggests that, in the canonical approach, the reduced phase-space method is likely to yield an incomplete description of quantum gravity. In particular, contrary to the indication provided by this method, quantum gravity may admit states with negative energies.

© 1982 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.26.3342
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevD.26.3342
PACS:

See Also

Comment: David G. Boulware, Comment on "On the canonical approach to quantum gravity", Phys. Rev. D 28, 414 (1983).