corner
corner

Phys. Rev. D 52, 6997–7010 (1995)

Black hole complementarity versus locality

Download: PDF (646 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

David A. Lowe, Joseph Polchinski, Leonard Susskind, Lárus Thorlacius, and John Uglum
Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106-4030
Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106-4030
Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-4060

Received 5 July 1995; published in the issue dated 15 December 1995

The evaporation of a large mass black hole can be described throughout most of its lifetime by a low-energy effective theory defined on a suitably chosen set of smooth spacelike hypersurfaces. The conventional argument for information loss rests on the assumption that the effective theory is a local quantum field theory. We present evidence that this assumption fails in the context of string theory. The commutator of operators in light-front string theory, corresponding to certain low-energy observers on opposite sides of the event horizon, remains large even when these observers are spacelike separated by a macroscopic distance. This suggests that degrees of freedom inside a black hole should not be viewed as independent from those outside the event horizon. These nonlocal effects are only significant under extreme kinematic circumstances, such as in the high-redshift geometry of a black hole. Commutators of spacelike separated operators corresponding to ordinary low-energy observers in Minkowski space are strongly suppressed in string theory. © 1995 The American Physical Society.

© 1995 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.52.6997
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevD.52.6997
PACS:
04.70.Dy, 11.25.Sq, 97.60.Lf