corner
corner

Phys. Rev. D 54, 1568–1586 (1996)

Hawking spectrum and high frequency dispersion

Download: PDF (318 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Steven Corley* and Ted Jacobson
Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Utrecht, P.O. Box 80.006, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands and Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742-4111

Received 24 January 1996; published in the issue dated 15 July 1996

We study the spectrum of created particles in two-dimensional black hole geometries for a linear, Hermitian scalar field satisfying a Lorentz noninvariant field equation with higher spatial derivative terms that are suppressed by powers of a fundamental momentum scale k0. The preferred frame is the "free-fall frame" of the black hole. This model is a variation of Unruh's sonic black hole analogy. We find that there are two qualitatively different types of particle production in this model: a thermal Hawking flux generated by "mode conversion" at the black hole horizon, and a nonthermal spectrum generated via scattering off the background into negative free-fall frequency modes. This second process has nothing to do with black holes and does not occur for the ordinary wave equation because such modes do not propagate outside the horizon with positive Killing frequency. The horizon component of the radiation is astonishingly close to a perfect thermal spectrum: for the smoothest metric studied, with Hawking temperature TH0.0008k0, agreement is of order (TH/k0)3 at frequency ω=TH, and agreement to order TH/k0 persists out to ω/TH45 where the thermal number flux is ∼10-20. The flux from scattering dominates at large ω and becomes many orders of magnitude larger than the horizon component for metrics with a "kink," i.e., a region of high curvature localized on a static world line outside the horizon. This nonthermal flux amounts to roughly 10% of the total luminosity for the kinkier metrics considered. The flux exhibits oscillations as a function of frequency which can be explained by interference between the various contributions to the flux.

© 1996 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.54.1568
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevD.54.1568
PACS:
04.70.Dy, 04.62.+v

*Electronic address:corley@undhep.umd.edu

Electronic address: jacobson@umdhep.umd.edu