corner
corner

Phys. Rev. D 64, 074011 (2001) [4 pages]

Production of the ηb(nS) states

Download: PDF (57 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Stephen Godfrey*
Ottawa-Carleton Institute for Physics, Department of Physics, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6

Jonathan L. Rosner
Enrico Fermi Institute and Department of Physics, University of Chicago, 5640 S. Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637

See Also: Erratum

Received 26 April 2001; published 5 September 2001

The rates for magnetic dipole (M1) transitions Υ(nS)→ηb(nS)+γ,n<~n are compared. The photon energies for allowed (n=n)M1 transitions are very small, so hindered (n<n) transitions could be more favorable for discovering the ηb(1S,2S). The question then arises whether Υ(2S) or Υ(3S) is a better source of ηb(1S). Whereas one nonrelativistic model favors ηb(1S) production from Υ(2S), this advantage is lost when relativistic corrections are taken into account, and is not common to all sets of wave functions even in the purely nonrelativistic limit. Thus the prospects for discovering ηb(1S) in Υ(3S) radiative decays could be comparable to those in Υ(2S) decays. We also discuss a suggestion for discovering ηb via Υ(3S)→hb(1P1)ππ, followed by hbηbγ.

© 2001 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.074011
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevD.64.074011
PACS:
14.40.Gx, 12.39.Ki, 13.20.Gd, 13.40.Hq

*Email address: godfrey@physics.carleton.ca

Email address: rosner@hep.uchicago.edu

See Also

Erratum: Stephen Godfrey and Jonathan L. Rosner, Erratum: Production of the ηb(nS) states [Phys. Rev. D 64, 074011 (2001)], Phys. Rev. D 65, 039901 (2002).