corner
corner

Phys. Rev. D 71, 115013 (2005) [18 pages]

Massive neutrinos and (heterotic) string theory

Download: PDF (222 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Joel Giedt
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, 60 St. George St., Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A7, Canada

G. L. Kane
Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA

Paul Langacker and Brent D. Nelson
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, USA

Received 1 March 2005; revised 25 April 2005; published 28 June 2005

String theories in principle address the origin and values of the quark and lepton masses. Perhaps the small values of neutrino masses could be explained generically in string theory even if it is more difficult to calculate individual values, or perhaps some string constructions could be favored by generating small neutrino masses. We examine this issue in the context of the well-known three-family standard-like Z3 heterotic orbifolds, where the theory is well enough known to construct the corresponding operators allowed by string selection rules, and analyze the D- and F-flatness conditions. Surprisingly, we find that a simple seesaw mechanism does not arise. It is not clear whether this is a property of this construction, or of orbifolds more generally, or of string theory itself. Extended seesaw mechanisms may be allowed; more analysis will be needed to settle that issue. We briefly speculate on their form if allowed and on the possibility of alternatives, such as small Dirac masses and triplet seesaws. The smallness of neutrino masses may be a powerful probe of string constructions in general. We also find further evidence that there are only 20 inequivalent models in this class, which affects the counting of string vacua.

© 2005 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.115013
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevD.71.115013
PACS:
12.60.Jv, 11.25.Mj, 14.60.Pq, 14.80.Ly