corner
corner

Phys. Rev. D 74, 114506 (2006) [19 pages]

Charm as a domain wall fermion in quenched lattice QCD

Download: PDF (964 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Huey-Wen Lin1,*, Shigemi Ohta2,3,4,†, Amarjit Soni5,‡, and Norikazu Yamada2,3,§
1Physics Department, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA
2Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, KEK, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan
3The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (Sokendai), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan
4RIKEN BNL Research Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
5Department of Physics, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA

Received 21 August 2006; published 13 December 2006

We report a study describing the charm quark by a domain-wall fermion (DWF) in lattice quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Our study uses a quenched gauge ensemble with the DBW2 rectangle-improved gauge action at a lattice cutoff of a-1∼3  GeV. We calculate masses of heavy-light (charmed) and heavy-heavy (charmonium) mesons with spin-parity JP=0 and 1, leptonic decay constants of the charmed pseudoscalar mesons (D and Ds), and the D0-D̅ 0 mixing parameter. The charm quark mass is found to be mcMS̅ (mc)=1.24(1)stat(18)syst  GeV. The mass splittings in charmed-meson parity partners Δq,J=0 and Δq,J=1 are degenerate within statistical errors, in accordance with experiment, and they satisfy a relation Δq=ud,J>Δq=s,J, also consistent with experiment. Using our lattice calculation of the splitting between hc and χc1 and the experimental χc1 mass, we obtain a parity-odd axial-vector charmonium state mhc=3533(11)stat(336)syst  MeV, with a systematic error dominated by heavy quark discretization at order (amc)2. However, in this regard, we emphasize significant discrepancies in the calculation of hyperfine splittings on the lattice. The leptonic decay constants of D and Ds mesons are found to be fD=232(7)stat(+6/-0)chiral(17)syst  MeV and fDs/fD=1.05(2)stat(+0/-2)chiral(2)syst, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic due to chiral extrapolation, and the third error is a combination of other known systematics. The D0-D̅ 0 mixing bag parameter, which enters the ΔC=2 transition amplitude, is found to be BD(2  GeV)=0.845(24)stat(+24/-6)chiral(105)syst. All the above systematic errors include our estimates of quenching errors.

© 2006 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.114506
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevD.74.114506
PACS:
11.15.Ha, 12.38.Gc, 13.20.Fc, 14.40.Lb

*Electronic address: hwlin@theory1.phys.columbia.edu

Electronic address: shigemi.ohta@kek.jp

Electronic address: soni@bnl.gov

§Electronic address: norikazu.yamada@kek.jp