corner
corner

Phys. Rev. D 75, 023522 (2007) [9 pages]

How robust are inflation model and dark matter constraints from cosmological data?

Download: PDF (474 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Jan Hamann1, Steen Hannestad2, Martin S. Sloth2, and Yvonne Y. Y. Wong3
1Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Notkestrasse 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany
2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
3Max-Planck-Institut für Physik (Werner-Heisenberg-Institut), Föhringer Ring 6, 80805 München, Germany

Received 30 November 2006; published 26 January 2007

High-precision data from observation of the cosmic microwave background and the large scale structure of the universe provide very tight constraints on the effective parameters that describe cosmological inflation. Indeed, within a constrained class of ΛCDM models, the simple λϕ4 chaotic inflation model already appears to be ruled out by cosmological data. In this paper, we compute constraints on inflationary parameters within a more general framework that includes other physically motivated parameters such as a nonzero neutrino mass. We find that a strong degeneracy between the tensor-to-scalar ratio r and the neutrino mass prevents λϕ4 from being excluded by present data. Reversing the argument, if λϕ4 is the correct model of inflation, it predicts a sum of neutrino masses at 0.3→0.5  eV, a range compatible with present experimental limits and within the reach of the next generation of neutrino mass measurements. We also discuss the associated constraints on the dark matter density, the dark energy equation of state, and spatial curvature, and show that the allowed regions are significantly altered. Importantly, we find an allowed range of 0.094<Ωch2<0.136 for the dark matter density, a factor of 2 larger than that reported in previous studies. This expanded parameter space may have implications for constraints on SUSY dark matter models.

© 2007 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.023522
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevD.75.023522
PACS:
98.80.Cq