corner
corner

Phys. Rev. D 76, 104001 (2007) [11 pages]

How (not) to use the Palatini formulation of scalar-tensor gravity

Download: PDF (180 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Alberto Iglesias1,*, Nemanja Kaloper1,†, Antonio Padilla2,‡, and Minjoon Park1,§
1Department of Physics, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA
2School of Physics and Astronomy, University Park, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom

Received 20 August 2007; published 1 November 2007

We revisit the problem of defining nonminimal gravity in the first order formalism. Specializing to scalar-tensor theories, which may be disguised as “higher-derivative” models with the gravitational Lagrangians that depend only on the Ricci scalar, we show how to recast these theories as Palatini-like gravities. The correct formulation utilizes the Lagrange multiplier method, which preserves the canonical structure of the theory, and yields the conventional metric scalar-tensor gravity. We explain the discrepancies between the naïve Palatini and the Lagrange multiplier approach, showing that the naïve Palatini approach really swaps the theory for another. The differences disappear only in the limit of ordinary general relativity, where an accidental redundancy ensures that the naïve Palatini approach works there. We outline the correct decoupling limits and the strong coupling regimes. As a corollary we find that the so-called “modified source gravity” models suffer from strong coupling problems at very low scales, and hence cannot be a realistic approximation of our universe. We also comment on a method to decouple the extra scalar using the chameleon mechanism.

© 2007 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.104001
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevD.76.104001
PACS:
04.50.+h

*iglesias@physics.ucdavis.edu

kaloper@physics.ucdavis.edu

antonio.padilla@nottingham.ac.uk

§park@physics.ucdavis.edu