Phys. Rev. D
81,
042002
(2010)
[5 pages]
Analysis of the low-energy electron-recoil spectrum of the CDMS experiment
Z. Ahmed et al. (CDMS Collaboration)
Show All Authors/Affiliations
Hide All Authors/Affiliations
Z. Ahmed1, D. S. Akerib2, S. Arrenberg17, C. N. Bailey2, D. Balakishiyeva15, L. Baudis17, D. A. Bauer3, J. Beaty16, P. L. Brink9, T. Bruch17, R. Bunker13, B. Cabrera9, D. O. Caldwell13, J. Cooley9, P. Cushman16, F. DeJongh3, M. R. Dragowsky2, L. Duong16, E. Figueroa-Feliciano5, J. Filippini12,1, M. Fritts16, S. R. Golwala1, D. R. Grant2, J. Hall3, R. Hennings-Yeomans2, S. Hertel5, D. Holmgren3, L. Hsu3, M. E. Huber14, O. Kamaev16, M. Kiveni10, M. Kos10, S. W. Leman5, R. Mahapatra11, V. Mandic16, D. Moore1, K. A. McCarthy5, N. Mirabolfathi12, H. Nelson13, R. W. Ogburn9,1, M. Pyle9, X. Qiu16, E. Ramberg3, W. Rau6, A. Reisetter7,16, T. Saab15, B. Sadoulet4,12, J. Sander13, R. W. Schnee10, D. N. Seitz12, B. Serfass12, K. M. Sundqvist12, G. Wang1, P. Wikus5, S. Yellin9,13, J. Yoo3, and B. A. Young8 (CDMS Collaboration)
1Department of Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA 2Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA 3Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA 4Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA 5Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA 6Department of Physics, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada, K7L 3N6 7Department of Physics, Saint Olaf College, Northfield, Minnesota 55057, USA 8Department of Physics, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California 95053, USA 9Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA 10Department of Physics, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA 11Department of Physics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 93106, USA 12Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA 13Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA 14Departments of Phys. & Elec. Engr., University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado 80217, USA 15Department of Physics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA 16School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA 17Physics Institute, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
Received 5 November 2009; published 24 February 2010
We report on the analysis of the low-energy electron-recoil spectrum from the CDMS II experiment using data with an exposure of 443.2 kg-days. The analysis provides details on the observed counting rate and possible background sources in the energy range of 2–8.5 keV. We find no significant excess of a peaked contribution to the total counting rate above the background model, and compare this observation to the recent DAMA results. In the framework of a conversion of a dark matter particle into electromagnetic energy, our 90% confidence level upper limit of 0.246 events/kg/day at 3.15 keV is lower than the total rate above background observed by DAMA. In absence of any specific particle physics model to provide the scaling in cross section between NaI and Ge, we assume a Z2 scaling. With this assumption the observed rate in DAMA remains higher than the upper limit in CDMS. Under the conservative assumption that the modulation amplitude is 6% of the total rate we obtain upper limits on the modulation amplitude a factor of ∼2 lower than observed by DAMA, constraining some possible interpretations of this modulation.
© 2010 The American Physical Society
URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.042002
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevD.81.042002
PACS:
29.40.-n, 29.40.Wk, 85.25.Oj, 95.30.Cq
|
|